目的的性质及其区分The Nature of an End and Its Distinctions

Chapter II.

Of the nature of an end in general, and some distinctions about it.

I. The end of any thing is that which the agent intendeth to accomplish in and by the operation which is proper unto its nature, and which it applieth itself unto, -- that which any one aimeth at, and designeth in himself to attain, as a thing good and desirable unto him in the state and condition wherein he is. So the end which Noah proposed unto himself in the building of the ark was the preservation of himself and others. According to the will of God, he made an ark to preserve himself and his family from the flood: "According to all that God commanded him, so did he," Gen. vi. 22. That which the agent doth, or whereto he applieth himself, for the compassing his proposed end, is called the means; which two do complete the whole reason of working in free intellectual agents, for I speak only of such as work according to choice or election. So Absalom intending a revolt from his father, to procure the crown and kingdom for himself, "he prepared him horses and chariots, and fifty men to run before him," 2 Sam. xv. 1; and farther, by fair words, and glossing compliances, "he stole the hearts of the men of Israel" verse 6; then pretends a sacrifice at Hebron, where he makes a strong conspiracy, verse 12; -- all which were the means he used for the attaining of his fore-proposed end.

II. Between both these, end and means, there is this relation, that (though in sundry kinds) they are mutually causes one of another. The end is the first, principal, moving cause of the whole. It is that for whose sake the whole work is. No agent applies itself to action but for an end; and were it not by that determined to some certain effect, thing, way, or manner of working, it would no more do one thing than another. The inhabitants of the old world desiring and intending unity and cohabitation, with perhaps some reserves to provide for their safety against a second storm, they cry, "Go to, let us build us a city, and a tower whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth," Gen. xi. 4. First, They lay down their aim and design, and then let out the means in their apprehension conducing thereunto. And manifest, then, it is, that the whole reason and method of affairs that a wise worker or agent, according to the counsel, proposeth to himself is taken from the end which he aims at; that is, in intention and contrivance, the beginning of all that order which is in working. Now, the means are all those things which are used for the attaining of the end proposed, -- as meat for the preservation of life, sailing in a ship for him that would pass the sea, laws for the quiet continuance of human society; and they are the procuring cause of the end, in one kind or another. Their existence is for the ends sake, and the end hath its rise out of them, following them either morally as their desert, or naturally as their fruit and product. First, In a moral sense. When the action and the end are to be measured or considered in reference to a moral rule, or law prescribed to the agent, then the means are the deserving or meritorious cause of the end; as, if Adam had continued in his innocency, and done all things according to the law given unto him, the end procured thereby had been a blessed life to eternity; as now the end of any sinful act is death, the curse of the law. Secondly, When the means are considered only in their natural relation, then they are the instrumentally efficient cause of the end. So Joab intending the death of Abner, "he smote him with his spear under the fifth rib, that he died," 2 Sam. iii. 27. And when Benaiah, by the command of Solomon, fell upon Shimei the wounds he gave him were the efficient of his death, 1 Kings ii. 46. In which regard there is no difference between the murdering of an innocent man and the executing of an offender; but as they are under a moral consideration, their ends follow their deservings, in respect of conformity to the rule, and so there is chasma mega between them.

III. The former consideration, by reason of the defect and perverseness of some agents (for otherwise these things are coincident), holds out a twofold end of things, -- first, of the work, and, secondly, of the workman; of the act and the agent: for when the means assigned for the attaining of any end are not proportioned unto it, nor, fitted for it, according to that rule which the agent is to work by, then it cannot be but that he must aim at one thing and another follow, in respect of the morality of the work. So Adam is enticed into a desire to be like God; this now he makes his aim, which to effect he eats the forbidden fruit, and that contracts a guilt which he aimed not at. But when the agent acts aright, and as it should do, -- when it aims at an end that is proper to it, belonging to its proper perfection and condition, and worketh by such means as are fit and suitable to the end proposed, -- the end of the work and the workman are one and the same; as when Abel intended the worship of the Lord, he offered a sacrifice through faith, acceptable unto him; or as a man, desiring salvation through Christ, applieth himself to get an interest in him. Now, the sole reason of this diversity is, that secondary agents, such as men are, have an end set and appointed to their actions by Him which giveth them an external rule or law to work by, which shall always attend them in their working, whether they will or no. God only, whose will and good pleasure is the sole rule of all those works which outwardly are of him, can never deviate in his actions, nor have any end attend or follow his acts not precisely by him intended.

IV. Again; the end of every free agent is either that which he effecteth, or that for whose sake he doth effect it. When a man builds a house to let to hire, that which he effecteth is the building of a house; that which moveth him to do it is love of gain. The physician cures the patient, and is moved to it by his reward. The end which Judas aimed at in his going to the priests, bargaining with them, conducting the soldiers to the garden, kissing Christ, was the betraying of his Master; but the end for whose sake the whole undertaking was set on foot was the obtaining of the thirty pieces of silver: "What will ye give me, and I will do it?" The end which God effected by the death of Christ was the satisfaction of his justice: the end for whose sake he did it was either supreme, or his own glory; or subordinate, ours with him.

V. Moreover, the means are of two sorts:-- First, Such as have a true goodness in themselves without reference to any farther kind; though not so considered as we use them for means. No means, as a means is considered as good in itself, but only as conducible to a farther end; it is repugnant to the nature of means, as such, to be considered as good in themselves. Study is in itself the most noble employment of the soul; but, aiming at wisdom or knowledge, we consider it as good only inasmuch as it conducteth to that end, otherwise as "a weariness of the flesh," Eccl. xii. 12. Secondly, Such as have no good at all in any kind, as in themselves considered, but merely as conducing to that end which they are fit to attain. They receive all their goodness (which is but relative) from that whereunto they are appointed, in themselves no way desirable; as the cutting off a leg or an arm for the preservation of life, taking a bitter potion for health's sake, throwing corn and lading into the sea to prevent shipwreck. Of which nature is the death of Christ, as we shall afterward declare.

VI. These things being thus proposed in general, our next task must be to accommodate them to the present business in hand; which we shall do in order, by laying down the agent working, the means wrought and the end effected, in the great work of our redemption; for these three must be orderly considered and distinctly, that we may have a right apprehension of the whole: into the first whereof, sun Theo, we make an entrance in [chapter third.] __________________________________________________________________

# 第二章 目的的性质及其区分

目的的一般性质,以及与目的有关的若干区分

一、目的与手段

一件事的目的,就是行动者照着自身的性质,运用属于自身的行动并投身其中时,想要借此成就的事;也就是一个人在自己里面所瞄准、所计划取得的事,并且在他当时所处的状态和境况中,把它看作对自己有益、值得追求的事。因此,挪亚建造方舟时为自己所定的目的,就是保全自己和别人。他照着神的旨意造方舟,要使自己和全家免遭洪水;「挪亚就这样行。凡神所吩咐的,他都照样行了」(创6:22)。

行动者为要达到所定的目的而作的事,或他为此投身去作的事,就称为手段。对一切凭选择或决定而行动、具有理智和自由的行动者来说,目的与手段这两者构成了自由行动的全部理路;我在这里所说的,只是这一类行动者。押沙龙想要背叛父亲,为自己夺取王位和国权,便「为自己预备车马,又派五十人在他前头奔走」(撒下15:1);随后又用甜言蜜语和讨好的迎合,「暗中得了以色列人的心」(6节);然后假称要往希伯仑献祭,却在那里结成强大的叛党(12节)。这一切都是他为达到先前所定的目的而采用的手段。

二、目的与手段互为因果的关系

目的与手段虽属于不同种类,却有一种彼此互为因果的关系。目的是整个行动最先、最主要、推动一切的原因;整个工作都是为它而作的。行动者若没有目的,就不会投身行动;目的若不把他的行动限定于某个特定的结果、事物、途径或行动方式,他就没有理由作这件事而不作另一件事。

古时世上的居民渴望并计划聚居一处,彼此联合;他们或许还暗自打算,防备第二次洪水的侵袭,便喊道:「来吧,我们要建造一座城和一座塔,塔顶通天,为要传扬我们的名,免得我们分散在全地上」(创11:4)。他们先定下自己的目标和计划,随后才展开他们以为有助于达到目标的手段。因此很明显,一个有智慧的行动者照着谋略为自己安排一切事务时,其全部理由和次序都是从他所瞄准的目的而来;在意图和筹划中,目的就是整个行动次序的开端。

手段则是为达到所定目的而采用的一切事物。例如,食物是保存生命的手段;人要渡海,乘船航行就是手段;律法是维持人类社会安宁长存的手段。手段以各种不同的方式,成为取得目的的原因。它们的存在是为了目的,而目的也由它们产生;目的或是在道德意义上随着手段而来,成为手段所配得的结果;或是在自然意义上随着手段而来,成为手段的果实和产物。

第一,就道德意义而言:当我们按照给行动者定下的道德准则或律法,衡量、考察行动及其目的时,手段就是使人配得该目的、取得该目的的原因。亚当若一直持守起初的纯正,凡事都照着赐给他的律法去行,借此取得的目的便是永远蒙福的生命;照样,如今任何罪行所带来的目的或结局,就是死亡和律法的咒诅。

第二,当我们只按手段与目的之间的自然关系来考察手段时,手段就是产生目的的工具性动力。约押想要杀死押尼珥,便刺透他的肚腹,使他死亡(参撒下3:27);所罗门命令比拿雅处死示每时,比拿雅给他的创伤也成为造成他死亡的动力(参王上2:46)。从这种关系来看,谋杀无辜者和处决罪犯并没有差别;但若把二者放在道德层面考察,它们各自的结局就照着其行为是否符合准则,成为各自所配得的结果;如此,两者之间便有一道极深的鸿沟。

三、工作的目的与行动者的目的

前面的考察又显出事物具有双重目的;这是由于某些行动者有缺陷、性情乖谬,否则这两种目的原本是一致的。第一种是工作的目的,第二种是作工者的目的;也就是行动本身的目的和行动者的目的。

行动者若为达到某个目的而采用手段,这手段却没有照着他应当遵行的准则与目的相称,也不适合那目的,那么从行动的道德性质来看,他所瞄准的必是一件事,实际随之而来的却是另一件事。亚当受诱惑,想要像神;他便把这事定为目标,又为达到这目标而吃了禁果,结果却招致他原先并没有瞄准的罪责。

但行动者若行动正当,按着所当行的去作;若他所瞄准的目的适合他的本性,属于他本身应有的完全和处境,又采用适当、与所定目的相称的手段,那么工作的目的和作工者的目的就是同一个目的。例如,亚伯定意敬拜主,便凭着信献上蒙主悦纳的祭;又如,一个人渴望借着基督得救,便竭力使自己与基督有分。

这种差异惟一的原因在于:像人这样的次等行动者,其行动的目的,是由那位赐给他们外在准则或律法、叫他们照着行的主所设立、所指定的。无论他们愿意不愿意,这准则所规定的结局总要随着他们的行动而来。惟有神的旨意和美意,是祂一切外在作为的惟一准则;因此,祂的行动绝不会偏离正道,也绝不会有任何并非祂准确预定的目的,附着于祂的行动或在行动之后出现。

四、行动所成就的目的,与行动所为的目的

再者,每一个自由行动者的目的,不是他所成就的事,就是他成就这事所为的那个缘故。一个人建造房屋,预备出租;他所成就的是一座房屋,推动他去建造的却是获利之心。医生医好病人,推动他这样作的是报酬。犹大去见祭司长,与他们谈妥条件,带领兵丁到园中,又亲吻基督;他这些行动所瞄准的目的,是出卖他的主。然而,发动这整个计划的目的,却是取得三十块钱:「我把他交给你们,你们愿意给我多少钱?」神借着基督之死所成就的目的,是满足祂的公义;祂如此行所为的目的,若说至高的,就是祂自己的荣耀;若说从属的,就是我们与祂同在所得的荣耀。

五、两类手段

此外,手段分为两类。

第一类手段,在不涉及任何更远目的的情况下,本身具有真实的益处;然而,当我们把它当作手段使用时,并不是这样看它。任何手段,只要是作为手段来考察,就不是因其本身的益处而被看为有益,只是因它有助于达到更远的目的而被看为有益。把手段本身当作目的、因其本身而看为有益,是与手段本身的性质相抵触的。研究学问本身是心灵最高贵的活动;但我们若以智慧或知识为目标,就只因研究有助于达到这目的,才把它看为有益;否则,它不过使人「身体疲倦」(传12:12)。

第二类手段,若只从其本身来考察,在任何意义上都没有益处;它们惟独因有助于达到某个适合由它们取得的目的,才成为有益。这一类手段所有的益处都从它们所要达成的目的而来,而且只是一种相对的益处;它们本身绝不可取。例如,为保存性命而截去一条腿或一只手臂;为恢复健康而喝下苦药;为免船只失事而把粮食和货物抛入海中。基督之死也具有这种性质,我们以后将加以说明。

六、把这些区分用于救赎之工

以上既已从一般原则说明这些事,我们下一步就必须把它们用于眼前所论的主题。我们要按着次序,陈明在救赎这大工中作工的行动者、所运用的手段,以及所成就的目的。这三件事必须依次并分别考察,我们才能正确领会整个救赎之工。靠着神的帮助,我们要在第三章开始考察第一件事。